↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Folic acid for fragile X syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Folic acid for fragile X syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008476.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

José-Ramón Rueda, Javier Ballesteros, Virginia Guillen, Maria-Isabel Tejada, Ivan Solà

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 207 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 47 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 32%
Psychology 28 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 12%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 20 10%
Unknown 54 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#7,485,442
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,962
of 12,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,536
of 109,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.