| Title |
Folic acid for fragile X syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd008476.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José‐Ramón Rueda, Javier Ballesteros, Virginia Guillen, Maria‐Isabel Tejada, Ivan Solà |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 61 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 30% |
| Psychology | 29 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 69 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,760,807
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,756
of 13,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,541
of 123,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#65
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.