↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
Title
Immunosuppressant and immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003643.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick A Gordon, John B Winer, Jessica E Hoogendijk, Ernest HS Choy

Abstract

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are chronic diseases with significant mortality and morbidity. Whilst immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are frequently used, the optimal therapeutic regimen remains unclear. This is an update of a review first published in 2005.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 202 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Student > Master 26 13%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 18 9%
Other 58 28%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 46 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,433,235
of 17,991,759 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,564
of 11,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,035
of 140,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,991,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.