↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Music education for improving reading skills in children and adolescents with dyslexia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
394 Mendeley
Title
Music education for improving reading skills in children and adolescents with dyslexia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009133.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Cogo-Moreira, Régis B Andriolo, Latife Yazigi, George B Ploubidis, Clara Regina Brandão de Ávila, Jair J Mari

Abstract

Dyslexia (or developmental dyslexia or specific reading disability) is a specific learning disorder that has a neurobiological origin. It is marked by difficulties with accurate or fluent recognition of words and poor spelling in people who have average or above average intelligence and these difficulties cannot be attributed to another cause, for example, poor vision, hearing difficulty, or lack of socio-environmental opportunities, motivation, or adequate instruction. Studies have correlated reading skills with musical abilities. It has been hypothesized that musical training may be able to remediate timing difficulties, improve pitch perception, or increase spatial awareness, thereby having a positive effect on skills needed in the development of language and literacy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 394 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 388 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 11%
Researcher 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 11%
Other 24 6%
Other 70 18%
Unknown 100 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 21%
Psychology 65 16%
Social Sciences 33 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 6%
Arts and Humanities 22 6%
Other 51 13%
Unknown 115 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,728,292
of 22,440,112 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,908
of 12,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,226
of 146,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,440,112 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,244 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.