The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Containment strategies for people with serious mental illness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002084.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sudha Muralidharan, Mark Fenton |
| Abstract |
The management of acutely disturbed people during periods of psychiatric crisis poses a particular challenge for mental health professionals. The challenge is to maintain safety while providing a safe and therapeutic environment. Non-pharmaceutical methods currently used to accomplish this include special observations, de-escalation, behavioural contracts and locking doors. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 44 | 22% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 25% |
| Psychology | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 56 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,186,935
of 26,626,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,398
of 13,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,335
of 92,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,626,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.