↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
161 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Houghton, Maura Dowling, Pauline Meskell, Andrew Hunter, Heidi Gardner, Aislinn Conway, Shaun Treweek, Katy Sutcliffe, Jane Noyes, Declan Devane, Jane R Nicholas, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 16%
Student > Master 15 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 9 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 37 36%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#221,635
of 19,188,609 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#416
of 11,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,735
of 324,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,188,609 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,943 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.