↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
161 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Houghton, Maura Dowling, Pauline Meskell, Andrew Hunter, Heidi Gardner, Aislinn Conway, Shaun Treweek, Katy Sutcliffe, Jane Noyes, Declan Devane, Jane R Nicholas, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 161 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 5 5%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 31 34%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#218,518
of 18,940,883 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#406
of 11,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,695
of 323,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,940,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.