↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
165 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
Title
Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.mr000045.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Houghton, Maura Dowling, Pauline Meskell, Andrew Hunter, Heidi Gardner, Aislinn Conway, Shaun Treweek, Katy Sutcliffe, Jane Noyes, Declan Devane, Jane R Nicholas, Linda M Biesty

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 224 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 13%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Unspecified 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 6%
Other 47 21%
Unknown 75 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Unspecified 18 8%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Psychology 9 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 84 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#273,798
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#449
of 12,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,868
of 413,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,357 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.