↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
Title
Pine bark (Pinus spp.) extract for treating chronic disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008294.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nina U Robertson, Anel Schoonees, Amanda Brand, Janicke Visser

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 30 20%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Psychology 7 5%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 40 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,336,998
of 17,388,379 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,971
of 11,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,744
of 320,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,388,379 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.