↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006212.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Young, Krishna Bajee Sriram

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Other 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 20 27%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 63%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,115,837
of 17,947,665 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,720
of 11,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,947
of 321,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,947,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.