↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006212.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Young, Krishna Bajee Sriram

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 137 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 17 12%
Other 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 36 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Chemistry 2 1%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 41 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,788,269
of 22,096,435 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,248
of 12,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,230
of 333,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,096,435 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.