Title |
Convalescent plasma or hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19: a living systematic review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013600.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Khai Li Chai, Sarah J Valk, Vanessa Piechotta, Catherine Kimber, Ina Monsef, Carolyn Doree, Erica M Wood, Abigail A Lamikanra, David J Roberts, Zoe McQuilten, Cynthia So-Osman, Lise J Estcourt, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 234 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 16 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 13 | 6% |
Italy | 13 | 6% |
India | 8 | 3% |
El Salvador | 7 | 3% |
Spain | 7 | 3% |
United States | 7 | 3% |
Australia | 6 | 3% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
Other | 50 | 21% |
Unknown | 102 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 183 | 78% |
Scientists | 25 | 11% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 273 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 34 | 12% |
Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
Other | 20 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 5% |
Other | 45 | 16% |
Unknown | 99 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 11% |
Unknown | 106 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 458. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2022.
All research outputs
#60,387
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#116
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,987
of 437,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.