↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tubal flushing for subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Tubal flushing for subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003718.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rui Wang, Andrew Watson, Neil Johnson, Karen Cheung, Cheryl Fitzgerald, Ben Willem J Mol, Lamiya Mohiyiddeen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,354,787
of 17,944,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,045
of 11,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,680
of 323,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,944,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.