| Title |
Early versus delayed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002975.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacqueline J Ho, Prema Subramaniam, Aarany Sivakaanthan, Peter G Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 10% |
| Mexico | 1 | 10% |
| Panama | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 59 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 70 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2023.
All research outputs
#4,053,152
of 24,698,221 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,599
of 12,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,554
of 421,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#111
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.