↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Early versus delayed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Early versus delayed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002975.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline J Ho, Prema Subramaniam, Aarany Sivakaanthan, Peter G Davis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,428,468
of 17,009,769 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,838
of 11,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,895
of 322,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,009,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,740 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.