↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Amphetamines for schizophrenia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Amphetamines for schizophrenia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004964
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sue Nolte, David Wong, Gary Latchford, Owen Boyle, Adaeze Anaenugwu

Abstract

It is estimated that between 10% and 65% of people with schizophrenia use illicit drugs such as amphetamines. This group have an increased rate of hospitalisation, homelessness, unemployment and suicide compared with those with schizophrenia who do not abuse drugs.

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 44 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 28%
Psychology 19 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 48 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2024.
All research outputs
#6,665,018
of 26,485,427 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,086
of 13,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,306
of 60,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,485,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.