↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Relief of pain due to uterine cramping/involution after birth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004908.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea R Deussen, Pat Ashwood, Ruth Martis, Fiona Stewart, Luke E Grzeskowiak

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 44 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 27%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 10 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,115,674
of 17,436,984 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,899
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,414
of 383,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,436,984 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.