↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005496.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sahar Sharif, Nicholas Meader, Sam J Oddie, Maria Ximena Rojas-Reyes, William McGuire

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 162 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 65 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 71 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2022.
All research outputs
#998,470
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,206
of 12,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,271
of 413,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.