| Title |
Prophylaxis of thromboembolism during therapy with asparaginase in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013399.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cecilie U Rank, Line Stensig Lynggaard, Bodil Als-Nielsen, Wendy Stock, Nina Toft, Ove Juul Nielsen, Thomas Leth Frandsen, Ruta Tuckuviene, Kjeld Schmiegelow |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2020.
All research outputs
#5,229,444
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,380
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,975
of 437,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.