↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Creatine and creatine analogues in hypertension and cardiovascular disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Creatine and creatine analogues in hypertension and cardiovascular disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005184.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah L Horjus, Inge Oudman, Gert A van Montfrans, Lizzy M Brewster

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 1%
Unknown 147 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 5%
Other 27 18%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2020.
All research outputs
#18,709,638
of 23,189,371 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,506
of 12,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,374
of 143,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#146
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,189,371 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.