↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
383 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006093.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie-Pierre Gagnon, France Légaré, Michel Labrecque, Pierre Frémont, Pierre Pluye, Johanne Gagnon, Josip Car, Claudia Pagliari, Marie Desmartis, Lucile Turcot, Karine Gravel

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICT) are defined as digital and analogue technologies that facilitate the capturing, processing, storage and exchange of information via electronic communication. ICTs have the potential to improve information management, access to health services, quality of care, continuity of services, and cost containment. Knowledge is lacking on conditions for successful ICT integration into practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 383 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 8 2%
Canada 5 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 353 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 22%
Researcher 64 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 5%
Other 20 5%
Other 86 22%
Unknown 57 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 11%
Computer Science 39 10%
Social Sciences 29 8%
Psychology 20 5%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 67 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,387,806
of 17,362,547 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,528
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,949
of 138,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,362,547 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.