↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Integration of HIV/AIDS services with maternal, neonatal and child health, nutrition, and family planning services

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
Title
Integration of HIV/AIDS services with maternal, neonatal and child health, nutrition, and family planning services
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010119
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary Lou Lindegren, Caitlin E Kennedy, Deborah Bain-Brickley, Hana Azman, Andreea A Creanga, Lisa M Butler, Alicen B Spaulding, Tara Horvath, Gail E Kennedy

Abstract

The integration of HIV/AIDS and maternal, neonatal, child health and nutrition services (MNCHN), including family planning (FP) is recognized as a key strategy to reduce maternal and child mortality and control the HIV/AIDS epidemic. However, limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of service integration.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 355 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 20%
Researcher 62 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 60 16%
Unknown 68 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 58 16%
Social Sciences 46 13%
Psychology 17 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 2%
Other 41 11%
Unknown 82 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#4,558,865
of 18,417,313 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,811
of 11,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,910
of 142,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,417,313 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.