The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Topical umbilical cord care at birth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001057.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jelka Zupan, Paul Garner, Aika AA Omari |
| Abstract |
Umbilical cord infection caused many neonatal deaths before aseptic techniques were used. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 176 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 63 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,584,054
of 26,443,530 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,873
of 13,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,498
of 60,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,443,530 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.