↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre‐eclampsia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
364 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
545 Mendeley
Title
Magnesium sulphate and other anticonvulsants for women with pre‐eclampsia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000025.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lelia Duley, A Metin Gülmezoglu, David J Henderson‐Smart, Doris Chou

Abstract

Eclampsia, the occurrence of a seizure (fit) in association with pre-eclampsia, is rare but potentially life-threatening. Magnesium sulphate is the drug of choice for treating eclampsia. This review assesses its use for preventing eclampsia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 534 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 14%
Student > Bachelor 76 14%
Researcher 56 10%
Student > Postgraduate 42 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 7%
Other 110 20%
Unknown 148 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 235 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 7%
Social Sciences 23 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 57 10%
Unknown 159 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#510,422
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#897
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,427
of 111,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.