| Title |
Adjunctive systemic antimicrobials for the non‐surgical treatment of periodontitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012568.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shivi Khattri, Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj, Ankita Arora, Prashanti Eachempati, Chandan Kumar Kusum, Kishore G Bhat, Trevor M Johnson, Giovanni Lodi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 28% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 32 | 17% |
| Unknown | 81 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 87 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,194,402
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,436
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,911
of 415,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.