↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

N‐acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
N‐acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006616.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamas Szakmany, Balázs Hauser, Peter Radermacher

Abstract

Death is common in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis-induced multisystem organ failure and it has been thought that antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine could be beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 162 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 11 7%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 48 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 56 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,760,741
of 25,478,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,480
of 13,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,758
of 187,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#96
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,478,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.