↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

N-acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
N-acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006616.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamas Szakmany, Balázs Hauser, Peter Radermacher

Abstract

Death is common in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis-induced multisystem organ failure and it has been thought that antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine could be beneficial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 18%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 38 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 43 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,648,178
of 22,592,847 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,314
of 12,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,513
of 150,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,592,847 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.