↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

N-acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
N-acetylcysteine for sepsis and systemic inflammatory response in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006616.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamas Szakmany, Balázs Hauser, Peter Radermacher

Abstract

Death is common in systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis-induced multisystem organ failure and it has been thought that antioxidants such as N-acetylcysteine could be beneficial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 121 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 34 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,816,724
of 17,679,473 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,361
of 11,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,321
of 140,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,679,473 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.