The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 80 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Routine laboratory testing to determine if a patient has COVID‐19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013787 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Inge Stegeman, Eleanor A Ochodo, Fatuma Guleid, Gea A. Holtman, Bada Yang, Clare Davenport, Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Sabine Dittrich, Devy Emperador, Lotty Hooft, René Spijker, Yemisi Takwoingi, Ann Van den Bruel, Junfeng Wang, Miranda Langendam, Jan Y Verbakel, Mariska MG Leeflang, Cochrane COVID-19 Diagnostic Test Accuracy Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
| Kenya | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 69% |
| Scientists | 15 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 336 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 4% |
| Other | 55 | 16% |
| Unknown | 141 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 52 | 15% |
| Unknown | 154 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#707,202
of 26,411,953 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,233
of 13,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,320
of 532,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,411,953 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.