| Title |
Individualized versus standard diet fortification for growth and development in preterm infants receiving human milk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013465.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Veronica Fabrizio, Jennifer M Trzaski, Elizabeth A Brownell, Patricia Esposito, Shabnam Lainwala, Mary M Lussier, James I Hagadorn |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 14% |
| Kyrgyzstan | 1 | 14% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 218 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 11% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 80 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unknown | 95 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,295,699
of 23,709,010 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,918
of 12,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,868
of 510,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,709,010 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.