↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Addition of long-acting beta2 agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists versus doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma with medium…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Addition of long-acting beta2 agonists or long-acting muscarinic antagonists versus doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in adolescents and adults with uncontrolled asthma with medium dose ICS: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013797
Authors

Yuji Oba, Tarang Patel, Sumayya Anwer, Tinashe Maduke, Sofia Dias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 50%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,050,553
of 19,496,717 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,855
of 11,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,836
of 468,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#44
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,496,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,944 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.