| Title |
Salvage systemic therapy for advanced gastric and oesophago‐gastric junction adenocarcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012078.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoko Tomita, Max Moldovan, Rachael Chang Lee, Amy Hc Hsieh, Amanda Townsend, Timothy Price |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 51 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 54 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,943,947
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,207
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,579
of 527,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#142
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.