↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
50 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Tourniquet use for knee replacement surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012874.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Imran Ahmed, Amit Chawla, Martin Underwood, Andrew J Price, Andrew Metcalfe, Charles Hutchinson, Jane Warwick, Kate Seers, Helen Parsons, Peter DH Wall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 112 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 7 6%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 43 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 47 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2022.
All research outputs
#301,040
of 22,388,998 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#537
of 12,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,906
of 501,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,388,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 501,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.