| Title |
Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010966.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kevin W Southern, Jared Murphy, Ian P Sinha, Sarah J Nevitt |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 38% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 136 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 61 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,435,258
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,204
of 12,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,639
of 483,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 483,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.