↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del)

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
18 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Corrector therapies (with or without potentiators) for people with cystic fibrosis with class II CFTR gene variants (most commonly F508del)
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010966.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W Southern, Jared Murphy, Ian P Sinha, Sarah J Nevitt

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 22%
Researcher 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Neuroscience 3 9%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 3 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2021.
All research outputs
#823,416
of 17,444,955 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,133
of 11,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,143
of 394,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,444,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,687 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.