↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
Title
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013579.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine McBain, Theresa A Lawrie, Ewelina Rogozińska, Ashleigh Kernohan, Tomos Robinson, Sarah Jefferies

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 138 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 14 10%
Unspecified 11 8%
Student > Master 10 7%
Other 9 7%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 51 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 24%
Unspecified 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 55 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,383,918
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,180
of 12,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,314
of 503,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 503,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.