↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Virtual reality for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Virtual reality for multiple sclerosis rehabilitation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013834
Authors

Emma De Keersmaecker, David Beckwée, Stijn Denissen, Guy Nagels, Eva Swinnen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 9 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 9 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Psychology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 15 45%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,301,818
of 23,271,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,870
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,670
of 502,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#128
of 175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,271,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.