| Title |
Visual cycle modulators versus placebo or observation for the prevention and treatment of geographic atrophy due to age‐related macular degeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013154.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jian Lee Yeong, Emma Loveman, Jill L Colquitt, Pamela Royle, Norman Waugh, Noemi Lois |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 42 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 50 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,878,424
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,662
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,927
of 515,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#149
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,608 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.