↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Extended lymph node resection versus standard resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Extended lymph node resection versus standard resection for pancreatic and periampullary adenocarcinoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011490.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralph F Staerkle, Raphael Nicolas Vuille-Dit-Bille, Christopher Soll, Rebekka Troller, Jaswinder Samra, Milo A Puhan, Stefan Breitenstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 41 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 44 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#22,835,295
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12,090
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#453,872
of 524,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#136
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.