↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
284 Mendeley
Title
Pain relief for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia undergoing colposcopy treatment
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2016
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006120.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ketankumar Gajjar, Pierre PL Martin-Hirsch, Andrew Bryant, Gemma L Owens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 284 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 284 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 30 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Researcher 18 6%
Other 48 17%
Unknown 103 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 12%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 114 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2024.
All research outputs
#4,752,264
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,920
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,756
of 381,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#137
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.