↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early‐stage cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early‐stage cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012863.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Apiwat Aue-Aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 12 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Researcher 7 4%
Student > Master 7 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 89 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 92 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,940,268
of 26,748,235 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,476
of 13,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,248
of 543,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#86
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,748,235 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 543,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.