↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Embed badge What is this page?

Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Blogs Twitter Facebook Dimensions citations
Title
Postoperative interventions for preventing bladder dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012863.pub2
Pubmed ID
33491176
Authors

Apiwat Aue-aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Siwanon Rattanakanokchai, Khadra Galaal, Teerayut Temtanakitpaisan, Chetta Ngamjarus, Pisake Lumbiganon

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 7 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 7%
Researcher 6 6%
Unspecified 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 49 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Unspecified 5 5%
Psychology 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 49 49%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,241,323
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,783
of 12,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,534
of 505,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#80
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.

This page is hosted by Altmetric on behalf of Cochrane Library.