| Title |
Desmopressin for nocturnal enuresis in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathryn MA Glazener, Jonathan HC Evans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 44 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 38% |
| Psychology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,059,926
of 22,880,691 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,372
of 12,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#827
of 44,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,691 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,329 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.