↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
267 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003524.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Sally Green, Joanne M Youd, Willem JJ Assendelft, Les Barnsley, Nynke Smidt

Abstract

This review is one in a series of reviews of interventions for lateral elbow pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 267 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 257 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 21%
Student > Bachelor 41 15%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Other 17 6%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 18%
Sports and Recreations 11 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 64 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,440,432
of 23,394,089 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,161
of 12,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,196
of 59,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.