↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
linkedin
1 LinkedIn user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Shock wave therapy for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003524.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Sally Green, Joanne M Youd, Willem JJ Assendelft, Les Barnsley, Nynke Smidt

Abstract

This review is one in a series of reviews of interventions for lateral elbow pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 224 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 24%
Student > Bachelor 37 16%
Researcher 23 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Other 15 6%
Other 43 18%
Unknown 40 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 19%
Sports and Recreations 9 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 50 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,148,539
of 18,763,644 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,781
of 11,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,542
of 147,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,763,644 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.