↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Duplex ultrasound for surveillance of lower limb revascularisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Duplex ultrasound for surveillance of lower limb revascularisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013852
Authors

Anna KP Sarpe, Carolina DQ Flumignan, Luis CU Nakano, Virginia FM Trevisani, Renato D Lopes, Henrique J Guedes Neto, Ronald LG Flumignan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2021.
All research outputs
#11,941,522
of 18,304,658 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,209
of 11,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,281
of 354,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,304,658 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.