↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012899.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Htay, David W Johnson, Jonathan C Craig, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Carmel M Hawley, Yeoungjee Cho

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Student > Postgraduate 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 51%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,345,526
of 19,891,915 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,006
of 11,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,666
of 403,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,891,915 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.