| Title |
Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013040.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Narelle S Cox, Simone Dal Corso, Henrik Hansen, Christine F McDonald, Catherine J Hill, Paolo Zanaboni, Jennifer A Alison, Paul O'Halloran, Heather Macdonald, Anne E Holland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 41% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 20% |
| Scientists | 7 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 487 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 487 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 9% |
| Researcher | 44 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 67 | 14% |
| Unknown | 242 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 23 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 9% |
| Unknown | 249 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,007,200
of 23,818,521 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,171
of 12,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,654
of 508,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,818,521 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.