↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
44 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006322.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leona Dowman, Catherine J Hill, Anthony May, Anne E Holland

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 327 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 14%
Student > Master 28 9%
Researcher 20 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 6%
Other 18 6%
Other 53 16%
Unknown 141 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 13%
Sports and Recreations 10 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 2%
Other 34 10%
Unknown 151 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#975,370
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,940
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,015
of 527,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 527,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.