↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
46 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
172 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006322.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leona Dowman, Catherine J Hill, Anthony May, Anne E Holland

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 172 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 171 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Master 16 9%
Researcher 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 31 18%
Unknown 65 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 19 11%
Unknown 69 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2022.
All research outputs
#781,272
of 22,257,736 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,685
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,382
of 421,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,257,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.