| Title |
Integrated community case management of childhood illness in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd012882.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas P Oliphant, Samuel Manda, Karen Daniels, Willem A Odendaal, Donela Besada, Mary Kinney, Emily White Johansson, Tanya Doherty |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 337 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 55 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 16% |
| Unknown | 119 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 57 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 38 | 11% |
| Unknown | 126 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,421,376
of 24,302,917 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,169
of 12,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,383
of 521,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,302,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,884 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 521,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.