↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ABeta42 for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia in participants diagnosed with any dementia subtype in a specialist care setting

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
22 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
Title
Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid ABeta42 for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease dementia in participants diagnosed with any dementia subtype in a specialist care setting
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010945.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Kokkinou, Lucy C Beishon, Nadja Smailagic, Anna H Noel-Storr, Chris Hyde, Obioha Ukoumunne, Rosemary E Worrall, Anja Hayen, Meera Desai, Abhishekh Hulegar Ashok, Eleanor J Paul, Aikaterini Georgopoulou, Tiziana Casoli, Terry J Quinn, Craig W Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 144 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 13 9%
Unspecified 9 6%
Other 9 6%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 55 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 26%
Psychology 14 10%
Unspecified 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 60 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,062,162
of 21,677,744 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,559
of 12,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,444
of 419,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,677,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.