↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000071.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saritphat Orrapin, Thoetphum Benyakorn, Dominic PJ Howard, Boonying Siribumrungwong, Kittipan Rerkasem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 11%
Unspecified 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 44 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Unspecified 8 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 45 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#15,564,321
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,854
of 12,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,668
of 419,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.