| Title |
Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd013390.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kwang M Cham, Larry A Abel, Ljoudmila Busija, Lionel Kowal, Anat Bachar Zipori, Laura E Downie |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Japan | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 56 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 59 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,679,170
of 23,426,104 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,643
of 12,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,571
of 421,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#117
of 183 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,426,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 183 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.