↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
64 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
320 Mendeley
Title
Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012876.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Xyrichis, Katerina Iliopoulou, Nicola J Mackintosh, Suzanne Bench, Marius Terblanche, Julia Philippou, Jane Sandall

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 320 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 320 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 9%
Researcher 26 8%
Student > Master 25 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 48 15%
Unknown 156 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 13%
Social Sciences 11 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 168 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#944,887
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,864
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,020
of 454,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.