↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
64 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
Title
Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd012876.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Xyrichis, Katerina Iliopoulou, Nicola J Mackintosh, Suzanne Bench, Marius Terblanche, Julia Philippou, Jane Sandall

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 197 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 14%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 72 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 15%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Unspecified 10 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 83 42%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#750,200
of 21,550,416 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,651
of 12,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,191
of 313,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,550,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,070 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.