↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013251.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tae Wook Kang, Jae Hung Jung, Eu Chang Hwang, Michael Borofsky, Myung Ha Kim, Philipp Dahm

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Unspecified 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 53 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Unspecified 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 21 14%
Unknown 63 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,286,844
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,159
of 11,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,598
of 392,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.