The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
New treatments compared to established treatments in randomized trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.mr000024.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin Djulbegovic, Ambuj Kumar, Paul P Glasziou, Rafael Perera, Tea Reljic, Louise Dent, James Raftery, Marit Johansen, Gian Luca Di Tanna, Branko Miladinovic, Heloisa P Soares, Gunn E Vist, Iain Chalmers |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 13% |
| United States | 9 | 7% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 17% |
| Scientists | 20 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 18% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2024.
All research outputs
#314,933
of 26,335,402 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#514
of 13,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,622
of 195,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,335,402 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.