RT @CochraneJapan: ランダム化試験における確立された治療法と新しい治療法 https://t.co/APRag36y6x
RT @CochraneJapan: ランダム化試験における確立された治療法と新しい治療法 https://t.co/APRag36y6x
ランダム化試験における確立された治療法と新しい治療法 https://t.co/APRag36y6x
コクランレビュー「ランダム化試験における確立された治療法と新しい治療法」の日本語要約です。ランダム化試験において新しい治療法と確立された治療法を比較した時、半分をわずかに上回る程度に新しい治療法の方が良いと判明しました。#CochraneDatabaseOfSystematicReviews https://t.co/afXyk5Wn4w
Roughly half of new treatments prove to be better than old treatments when tested in RCTs (randomized controlled trials), but few will be substantially better. • New treatment reduces primary outcome HR 0.91 • Improves overall survival HR 0.95 https://t.co
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: THIS 👇🏼 https://t.co/BJHBc2Z5dV
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: THIS 👇🏼
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: THIS 👇🏼
RT @DrAseemMalhotra: THIS 👇🏼
THIS 👇🏼
Op zich was dit 7 jaar geleden ook al bekend,zie ook: https://t.co/DskSxoK8P5. Hopelijk gaat programma van @SjoerdRepping helpen hier verbetering in te brengen. #betaalbaarheid #zorg
@HenkJanOut Natuurlijk, zie: https://t.co/DskSxoK8P5
RT @SDM_ULAVAL: #PODC2017 @DrVikasSaini few medical innovations add value https://t.co/lOexn0FdjZ
RT @SDM_ULAVAL: #PODC2017 @DrVikasSaini few medical innovations add value https://t.co/lOexn0FdjZ
RT @SDM_ULAVAL: #PODC2017 @DrVikasSaini few medical innovations add value https://t.co/lOexn0FdjZ
RT @SDM_ULAVAL: #PODC2017 @DrVikasSaini few medical innovations add value https://t.co/lOexn0FdjZ
#PODC2017 @DrVikasSaini few medical innovations add value https://t.co/lOexn0FdjZ
RT @StefaniaArciell: New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials https://t.co/w77NUu5vDY
New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials https://t.co/w77NUu5vDY
@jodyaberdein Cochrane review told us years ago that new drugs rarely better than old ones https://t.co/KBk6wigkQw
RT @felly500: @DeborahSaltman half of new drugs are no better than what they replace - Cochrane review https://t.co/h3RnGXtwVd
@DeborahSaltman half of new drugs are no better than what they replace - Cochrane review https://t.co/h3RnGXtwVd
@pash22 @sciencescanner @DrDavidWarriner @NICEcomms like many shiny new things -Probably not Cochrane review says so https://t.co/h3RnGXtwVd
@Cleverestcookie @RslewisSally there was a cochrane review that said new meds better than old meds <50% of time https://t.co/h3RnGXtwVd
RT @pash22: New treatments compared 2 established treatments in RCTs via @PaulGlasziou HT @felly500 https://t.co/DWefYTnr5Q https://t.co/B6…
New treatments compared 2 established treatments in RCTs via @PaulGlasziou HT @felly500 https://t.co/DWefYTnr5Q https://t.co/B6BjzPCSGs
@pash22 @VinayPrasad82 was it a story sponsored by the ABPI? Cochrane tells is new is often not better than existing https://t.co/uHex6dhpL7
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
RT @_muscleblog: Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de c…
Los nuevos tratamientos médicos no superan a los anteriores https://t.co/h2Mwmx83Dm festival de tecnofilia y placebos de colores (dañinos)
“@MccabeCJM: @sciencescanner @forbeshealth @peterubel new drugs seldom better than old Tx sez Cochrane Review http://t.co/8Wqe1UAskh
Overestimation benefit http://t.co/Pnp76sR7sj +new tx=old tx http://t.co/uHex6e8d9j + marketing$ > R&D$ http://t.co/fu0JcO24YY = poor value
Overestimation benefit http://t.co/Pnp76sR7sj +new tx=old tx http://t.co/uHex6e8d9j + marketing$ > R&D$ http://t.co/fu0JcO24YY = poor value
we can expect c50% new tx will prove better than established tx when tested in RCTs,few will b much better @jpraft http://t.co/uHex6e8d9j
“@stephensenn: pinch of data worth a pound of pontification http://t.co/5ZxbJf0Bjh by @jpraft & others. Only 4 sets of trials. Update due.
A pinch of data is worth a pound of pontification & that makes this http://t.co/9ZbkOZC2nv by @jpraft & others very useful.
A pinch of data is worth a pound of pontification & that makes this http://t.co/9ZbkOZC2nv by @jpraft & others very useful.
One of systematic review that has a bit unusual question but very interesting, is this one http://t.co/ypLq8vgYhN
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
La mayoría de nuevos tratamientos médicos no son sustancialmente mejores a los anteriores http://t.co/nsQsO8txCG xo se renueva la patente ;)
Tratamientos nuevos no son mejores que sus predecesores @Oscar_Canon_l @no_HAY_palabras . http://t.co/uSE0U2jNR7
Tratamientos nuevos no son mejores que sus predecesores @Oscar_Canon_l @no_HAY_palabras . http://t.co/uSE0U2jNR7
Ever wanted to see the probability distribution of effect sizes in #RCTs? Well, who hasn't? #cochrane have the answer http://t.co/QI1QJUz8
Ever wanted to see the probability distribution of effect sizes in #RCTs? Well, who hasn't? #cochrane have the answer http://t.co/QI1QJUz8
@GrapheneTiger is this sm kind of weird game where you post more asinine anecdotes and I post the systematic review? http://t.co/6IWMXJRvRr
@GrapheneTiger You’re still going with the anecdotes. http://t.co/6IWMXJRvRr
@GrapheneTiger once again, i’ll answer your anecdotes - and your embarrassing ignorance - with a systematic review. http://t.co/6IWMXJRvRr
@GrapheneTiger the scale of your ignorance is staggering, perhaps you shld read Bad Pharma? Here’s a sys review. http://t.co/6IWMXJRvRr
New treatments vs established treatments in randomised trials http://t.co/i9HJ1M13BE #research
Only half of new treatments outperform established treatments in randomized trials http://t.co/ncyrHz0zDd
New treatments compared to established treatments in randomized trials The Cochrane Library Djulbegovic http://t.co/PgYoNS1V
Society can expect that slightly more than half of new experimental treatments will prove to be better than... http://t.co/lMgBVlPk
Ever wanted to see the probability distribution of effect sizes in #RCTs? Well, who hasn't? #cochrane have the answer http://t.co/QI1QJUz8
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
How often are new treatments more effective, equally effective or less effective than established treatments? http://t.co/BhhCLhdA
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
Impt paper, depending on how u value incremental progress. MT“@Richard56: New treatments hardly better than old ones. http://t.co/z6x1qIV6”
50% of new experimental treatments prove to be better than established treatments, but few are much better http://t.co/ZfwXFnX4
“@DrVes: 50% of new experimental treatments prove to be better than established treatments, but few are much better http://t.co/L09XLKum”
RT @DrVes: 50% of new experimental treatments prove to be better than established treatments, but few are much better http://t.co/20LAKgJ3
50% of new experimental treatments prove to be better than established treatments, but few are much better http://t.co/ZfwXFnX4
50% of new experimental treatments prove to be better than established treatments, but few are much better http://t.co/ZfwXFnX4
Ha avanzado la medicina?????? Old vs New.. The Cochrane Library-Djulbegovic-Wiley Online Library http://t.co/ShSMtgqH
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
RT @Richard56: New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
New treatments are hardly any better than old ones. Progress is an illusion. http://t.co/pp86SmhY
RT @magnenylenna: Gamle medisinske metoder er ikke alltid dårligst, og nye er ikke alltid best. Kunnskapssenterkronikk i DN 10.11.12 http://t.co/8QLfPOxK
Gamle medisinske metoder er ikke alltid dårligst, og nye er ikke alltid best. Kunnskapssenterkronikk i DN 10.11.12 http://t.co/8QLfPOxK
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
http://t.co/jRoXpTJW New treatments compared to established treatments in randomized trials.: CON... http://t.co/ndGKv7CU #backpain #pain
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
New Cochrane review finds that only half of new treatments are shown to be superior to established treatments in RCTs. http://t.co/WWSBrgPc
Slightly more than half of new treatments will prove to be better than established treatments in publicly funded RCTs http://t.co/mhcjFj9T
Good one: “@cochranecollab: #Cochrane Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs http://t.co/1nY8ewef”
RT @sasiancc: New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials | Cochrane Summaries http://t.co/ytRlya0e
New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials http://t.co/t340GGXa
New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials | Cochrane Summaries http://t.co/ytRlya0e
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
@bengoldacre RT @cochranecollab: Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/VpG5Y6p4
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
RT @cochranecollab: New #Cochrane Methodology Review | Are new treatments better than established treatments when compared in #RCTs? | http://t.co/F89VUOi4
Really interesting analysis on "New treatments versus established treatments in randomized trials" http://t.co/WrXR5TTs #RCT #ethics