↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
130 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Autologous platelet-rich plasma for treating chronic wounds
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006899.pub2
Authors

Maria José Martinez-Zapata, Arturo J Martí-Carvajal, Ivan Solà, José Angel Expósito, Ignasi Bolíbar, Luciano Rodríguez, Joan Garcia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 42 27%
Unknown 29 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 60 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,653,403
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,092
of 12,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,799
of 246,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#140
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.