↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
31 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2021
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009593.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jerry S Zifodya, Jonah S Kreniske, Ian Schiller, Mikashmi Kohli, Nandini Dendukuri, Samuel G Schumacher, Eleanor A Ochodo, Frederick Haraka, Alice A Zwerling, Madhukar Pai, Karen R Steingart, David J Horne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 251 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Master 25 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Other 17 7%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 97 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 6%
Unspecified 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 30 12%
Unknown 111 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,602,048
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,421
of 11,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,202
of 451,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#59
of 140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.