Agree that two negative Xpert can help rule-out TB. But test has 98.4% specificity (https://t.co/T6IH0fQXws) suggesting 1/60 TB- samples will be +. Does doing a second test double the risk of false+? Does anyone see +Xpert results in samples that are the
In a systematic review and metanalysis, Tulane experts and colleagues examine the sensitivity and specificity of two tests for #TB. #TulaneResearch #InfectiousDiseases https://t.co/vCjrsdzGWL
In a systematic review and metanalysis, Tulane experts and colleagues examine the sensitivity and specificity of two tests for #TB. #TulaneResearch #InfectiousDiseases https://t.co/tEgQNsoInA
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary tuberculosis https://t.co/KTUN6Mol3H https://t.co/sRqvZmDyd8
RT @ATS_BSHSR: Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary #tuberculosis and #rifampicin #resistance in adults with #presumptive #pulmo…
RT @ATS_BSHSR: Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary #tuberculosis and #rifampicin #resistance in adults with #presumptive #pulmo…
Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary #tuberculosis and #rifampicin #resistance in adults with #presumptive #pulmonary #tuberculosis #TB #Lung https://t.co/p07xzQFnkr https://t.co/I3ATSYI3I5
RT @uwpccm: Take a look at this important @cochranecollab review by fellow grad @JerryZifodya and current faculty David Horne on Xpert Ultr…
RT @Cochrane_IDG: Updated #Cochrane Review published: #Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistan…
RT @uwpccm: Take a look at this important @cochranecollab review by fellow grad @JerryZifodya and current faculty David Horne on Xpert Ultr…
Take a look at this important @cochranecollab review by fellow grad @JerryZifodya and current faculty David Horne on Xpert Ultra vs MTB/RIF for TB and rifampicin resistance! https://t.co/DPbeUE8hPk
RT @mbehr_mcgill: If I understand, the Ultra has specificity ~ 96%. Am I the only one who thinks this is concerning? https://t.co/vmd0M2TK…
If I understand, the Ultra has specificity ~ 96%. Am I the only one who thinks this is concerning?
Link: https://t.co/fjfChM8Hi6
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
RT @McGill_TB: Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-…
Xpert Ultra has higher sensitivity and lower specificity than Xpert MTB/RIF for pulmonary tuberculosis, especially in smear-negative participants and people living with HIV https://t.co/0E6scAXOEN https://t.co/J67RCIcwk8
RT @Cochrane_IDG: Updated #Cochrane Review published: #Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistan…
Great update by @MikashmiKohli & colleagues. Ultra a bit more sensitive than Xpert MTB/RIF, but slightly more false positives. Great review and nicely done studies
RT @Cochrane_IDG: Updated #Cochrane Review published: #Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistan…
Updated #Cochrane Review published: #Xpert Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for #pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults with presumptive pulmonary #tuberculosis. Access the full-text open access review here: https://t.co/4xTIfcIUVT @Cochrane_